Switzerland is in a unique position in Europe, as it is not an EU Member State but is deeply integrated into the EU's internal market in economic and regulatory terms. Unlike other countries, Switzerland has chosen not to join the European Economic Area or the EU itself, but to build its relations through a complex network of bilateral agreements. These agreements allow Switzerland to access key sectors of the single market while preserving its political sovereignty. However, this flexible model of cooperation is becoming increasingly burdensome as evolving EU legal standards and political pressures call into question the long-term sustainability of the bilateral approach.

The origins of Switzerland's bilateral agreements with the EU date back to 1992, when Swiss voters rejected accession to the European Economic Area (EEA), prioritizing national sovereignty over deeper integration. In response, Switzerland adopted a strategy of sectoral bilateralism, opting for individual agreements with the EU rather than comprehensive membership. This approach is embodied in two major sets of agreements, Bilateral I (1999) and Bilateral II (2004). Bilateral I focused on areas such as trade, free movement of persons, air transport and public procurement, while Bilateral II extended cooperation to sectors such as research, security and agriculture, emphasizing Switzerland's strong economic interests.

The relationship between Switzerland and the EU is not based on a single comprehensive treaty, but on a series of sectoral bilateral agreements, the most important of which cover the free movement of persons, trade and mutual recognition of the conformity of products, public procurement, agriculture, research cooperation, and air and land transport. Each agreement operates independently and gives Switzerland access to certain sectors of the EU internal market. The operation of these agreements is managed by Swiss-EU Joint Committees, which oversee implementation, monitor compliance with the agreements and settle disputes. A critical feature of the bilateral framework is the distinction between dynamic and static alignment: in some areas, Switzerland must continuously update its legislation in line with evolving EU regulations, while in other areas agreements remain fixed unless renegotiated. This fragmented structure provides flexibility but also creates legal and political challenges over time. 

The bilateral model offers several key advantages for Switzerland in its relations with the European Union. First, unlike full EU or EEA membership, this model preserves Switzerland's sovereignty by avoiding supranational authorities. Switzerland retains full legislative and political independence while engaging with the EU in a selective manner. Secondly, sectoral negotiations provide flexibility, allowing Switzerland to choose the specific areas in which it wishes to cooperate, such as trade, research or transport. Thirdly, the model has significant economic benefits, as it gives Switzerland access to vital sectors of the EU's internal market without full membership obligations. Switzerland retains its diplomatic autonomy and thus remains able to pursue an independent foreign policy, as it is not bound by the EU's external service. This framework has supported Switzerland's prosperity while preserving its political independence. 

Despite its advantages, the bilateral model poses significant constraints and challenges for Switzerland. One of the main drawbacks is the lack of formal decision-making power: Switzerland often must transpose evolving EU legislation in the sectors covered by the agreements without having any influence on its drafting. In addition, legal uncertainty is created by the fact that bilateral agreements are not automatically updated in line with EU developments, leading to potential gaps and tensions. The EU is increasingly pushing for institutional modernization and a comprehensive framework agreement to ensure greater legal consistency and facilitate dispute settlement. The political dynamics in Switzerland also complicate internal relations, with referendums and public opposition often hampering deeper integration efforts, as exemplified by the 2014 immigration vote. In the event of political disagreements, Switzerland risks marginalization, as illustrated by its temporary exclusion from Horizon Europe. These challenges call into question the long-term sustainability of the bilateral approach.

The proposed Institutional Framework Agreement (IFA) was intended to streamline relations between Switzerland and the EU by introducing a dynamic legal adaptation process and establishing a dispute settlement mechanism like the European Court of Justice. The EU sought this agreement to ensure greater legal homogeneity and simplify bilateral relations. However, Switzerland eventually rejected the IFA in 2021, citing concerns about national sovereignty, protection of Swiss wage levels, possible restrictions under EU state aid rules and fears of uncontrolled migration. The rejection has increased political tensions, leading to increased EU pressure and gradually eroding Switzerland's privileged access to the internal market. It has jeopardized Switzerland's participation in major EU programs such as Horizon Europe and highlighted the vulnerability of the existing bilateral framework, which lacks a comprehensive institutional basis.

For the future, there are several possible paths for Switzerland's relationship with the European Union. One scenario is the gradual erosion of the benefits provided by bilateral agreements. Without a comprehensive framework agreement, access to EU markets and programs may weaken over time, which could reduce Switzerland's economic competitiveness. In another scenario, ad hoc renegotiations at sectoral level would continue, but this approach would likely become increasingly complex and politically unpredictable, with the risk of further fragmentation of relations. A third, less likely scenario is a reassessment of Switzerland's position on deeper integration, which could entail rethinking closer institutional ties if economic pressures become too great to ignore.

In sum, Switzerland's bilateral agreements have successfully balanced economic integration and political sovereignty for decades. But increasing legal, political and economic pressures are straining this flexible model. As the EU moves towards deeper internal cohesion, Switzerland faces a strategic dilemma: either align more closely with EU structures to preserve economic access or prioritize national sovereignty at the risk of increasing isolation. The coming years are likely to require difficult choices as Switzerland redefines its key priorities.

Sources:

Bernath, K. (2021). Switzerland and the EU: The failure of the Institutional Framework Agreement. Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS). Retrieved from https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/switzerland-and-the-eu/

Bundesrat [Swiss Federal Council]. (2021, May 26). Federal Council decides not to sign the Institutional Framework Agreement with the EU. Retrieved from https://www.admin.ch/gov/en/start/documentation/media-releases.msg-id-83507.html

Delreux, T., & Keukeleire, S. (2017). The foreign policy of the European Union (2nd ed.). London: Red Globe Press.

European Commission. (n.d.). EU–Switzerland relations. Retrieved March 2025, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/relations-eu-switzerland_en

European Parliament. (2023). Report on EU–Switzerland relations (A9-0248/2023). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0248_EN.html

European Union. (n.d.). Bilateral agreements between the EU and Switzerland. Access2Markets Portal. Retrieved March 2025, from https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/content/switzerland

Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA). (2024). Switzerland and the European Union: Bilateral agreements. Swiss Confederation. Retrieved from https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/home/foreign-policy/european-policy/bilateral-agreements.html

Gstöhl, S. (2002). Reluctant Europeans: Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland in the process of integration. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Gstöhl, S. (2015). Models of external differentiation in the EU’s neighbourhood: An expanding economic community? Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 854–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020836

Kaddous, C. (2015). Switzerland and the European Union: A close, contradictory and misunderstood relationship. European Foreign Affairs Review, 20(1), 113–130.

Lavenex, S. (2009). Switzerland's flexible integration: How sectoral agreements achieve domestic objectives. Swiss Political Science Review, 15(4), 547–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2009.tb00110.x

Lavenex, S. (2018). Switzerland’s differentiated European integration: Between mutual accommodation and conflict. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(4), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12320

Maiani, F. (2021). Sovereignty and European integration: Lessons from the Swiss experience. European Constitutional Law Review, 17(2), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019621000136

Obradovic, D., & Jovanovic, M. (2016). The European Economic Area and Switzerland: Integration without membership? In E. Jones, A. Menon, & S. Weatherill (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Union (pp. 457–471). Oxford University Press.

Schimmelfennig, F. (2010). Differentiated integration: The case of Switzerland. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(6), 844–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2010.486977

Schimmelfennig, F. (2019). Switzerland's bilateralism and the future of differentiated integration. Journal of European Integration, 41(5), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1513490

Swiss Mission to the European Union. (2024). The future of Switzerland–EU relations: Current perspectives and challenges. Retrieved from https://www.missione-svizzera-bruxelles.ch/eu/en/home/eu-policy/future-relations.html